4.2 Article

Selection of human single domain antibodies recognizing the CMYC protein using enhanced intracellular antibody capture

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 426, 期 -, 页码 140-143

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2015.08.009

关键词

Intracellular antibody; Intrabody; Cancer; Chromosomal translocations; Leukemia; Antibody

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MRC MR/J000612/1]
  2. Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research [LLR 12051]
  3. Wellcome Trust [WT 099246/Z/12/Z]
  4. Medical Research Council [G0600914, MC_U105178807, MC_UU_12009/17] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Wellcome Trust [099246/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [MC_U105178807, MC_UU_12009/17, G0600914] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Wellcome Trust [099246/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein functions that are mediated by interaction with other proteins (protein-protein interactions, PPI) are important for normal cell biology and also in disease. Molecules that can interfere with PPI are required as laboratory tools to dissect function, as lead drug surrogates for target validation and as templates for drug discovery. We describe enhanced developments to Intracellular Antibody Capture (IAC) technology that can select antibody fragments able to interact with targets in cells. This is illustrated by the isolation of single heavy chain variable region domains binding to the basic-helix-loop-helix and leucine zipper region of the CMYC oncogenic protein. The enhanced IAC (eIAC) methodology deploys screening in yeast cells of a single diverse library initially with randomization only of CDR3. Further sequential randomization of CDR2 and CDR1 of three independently selected anti-CMYC clones illustrates an in vivo affinity maturation process. This concise eIAC approach facilitates the rapid selection of antibody fragments to explore the proteome interaction spectrum of mammalian cells and disease targeting. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据