4.7 Article

Does Autotitrating Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Improve Postoperative Outcome in Patients at Risk for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome? A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

期刊

CHEST
卷 144, 期 1, 页码 72-78

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-0989

关键词

-

资金

  1. ResMed Research Foundation
  2. Mayo Clinic Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea has been associated with postoperative complications. We hypothesized that postoperative autotitrating positive airway pressure (APAP) applied to patients at high risk for obstructive sleep apnea would shorten hospital stay and reduce postoperative complications. Methods: Included were patients aged 18 to 100 years scheduled for elective total knee, or hip arthroplasty who were able to give informed consent. Patients without contraindication to positive airway pressure therapy were divided into a high- or low-risk group on the basis of the Flemons sleep apnea clinical score. Low-risk patients received standard care. High-risk patients were randomized to receive standard care or standard care plus postoperative APAR All patients were administered a predismissal cardiorespiratory sleep study. The primary end point was length of stay, and secondary end points were a range of postoperative complications. Results: One hundred thirty-eight patients were enrolled in the study (52 in the low-risk group, 86 in the high-risk group). Within the high-risk group, 43 were randomized to standard care and 43 to standard care plus postoperative APAP. There were no significant differences in the length of stay (P = .65) or any of the secondary end points between the randomized groups. On subgroup analysis of patients with an apnea-hypopnea index of >= 15, patients randomized to APAP had a longer postoperative stay (median, 5 vs 4 days; P = .02). Conclusions: The role for empirical postoperative APAP requires further study, but the findings did not show benefit for APAP applied postoperatively to positive airway pressure-naive patients at high risk for sleep apnea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据