4.2 Article

Changes in Gut Microbiota May Be Early Signs of Liver Toxicity Induced by Epoxiconazole in Rats

期刊

CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 60, 期 2, 页码 135-142

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000371837

关键词

Epoxiconazole; Gut microbiota; Host health; Liver toxicity; Microarray analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172694, 81270537, 81373041, 81302453]
  2. Research Project of the Chinese Ministry of Education [213015A]
  3. Outstanding Youth Fund of Jiangsu Province [SBK2014010296]
  4. Qinglan project of Jiangsu Province [JX2161015124]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The gut microbiome is essential for human health due to its effects on disease development, drug metabolism and the immune system. It may also play a role in the interaction with environmental toxicants. However, the effect of epoxiconazole, a fungicide active ingredient from the class of azoles developed to protect crops, on the abundance and composition of the gut microbiome has never been studied. We put forward the hypothesis that changes in gut microbiota may be early signs of toxicity induced by epoxiconazole. Methods: In this study, female rats were fed with epoxiconazole-adulterated diets (0, 4 and 100 mg/kg/day) for 90 days. The gut microbiome was determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Body and organ weight, and blood biochemistry were also measured after 90 days of oral epoxiconazole exposure. Results: Interestingly, the abundance of gut Firmicutes decreased, and Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria increased. At family level, Lachnospiraceae and Enterobacteriaceae were selectively enriched following epoxiconazole exposure. Our results indicate that epoxiconazole exposure may induce changes in the gut microbiome and potential liver toxicity. Conclusion: Changes in the gut microbiome may be used as early indicators for monitoring the health risk of the host. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据