4.2 Article

The Different Induction Mechanisms of Growth Arrest DNA Damage Inducible Gene 45 β in Human Hepatoma Cell Lines

期刊

CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 165-174

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000338386

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; GADD45 beta; NF-kappa B; E2F-1

资金

  1. Nature Science Foundation of China [81172326, 30872511]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [10ZR1419400]
  3. Shanghai Charity Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Downregulation of the growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible gene 45 beta (GADD45 beta) has been verified to be specific to HCC and consistent with the degree of malignan-cy. The differences in induction mechanisms of GADD45 beta were investigated based on transcriptional regulation. Methods: Following our published data from S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe), oxaliplatin and sorafenib were further used to stimulate GADD45(3 expression in cultured HepG2 (p53 wild type) and Hep3B (p53 null) hepatoma cells in vitro. The different effects on cell viability, DNA synthesis and caspase activities were also measured. Results: Oxaliplatin and sorafenib could induce GADD45 beta in both HepG2 and Hep3B in a dose-dependent manner with rapid and direct cytotoxic effect. Transcriptional activity of NF-kappa B and E2F-1 were both enhanced by oxaliplatin and sorafenib. However, SAMe could only induce GADD45 beta in HepG2 through the NF-kappa B pathway, resulting in a slow and indirect cytotoxic effect. Although all three inducers could lead to a pronounced rise in caspase activities, only high concentration of SAMe could inhibit DNA synthesis as significantly as the chemo drugs. No apparent changes in GADD45 beta induction, promoter activity or cytotoxic effects were observed in Hep3B(+P53) when treated with oxaliplatin and sorafenib, while relatively significant changes occurred with SAMe. Conclusion: GADD45 beta induction is a novel mechanism of SAMe-mediated hepatoprotec-tion with p53 involvement. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据