4.7 Article

Application of intensified Fenton oxidation to the treatment of sawmill wastewater

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 34-41

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.062

关键词

Fenton process intensification; Sawmill wastewater; Wood preservative; Ecotoxicity

资金

  1. Spanish MICINN [CTQ2008-03988, CTQ2010-14807]
  2. CM [S-2009/AMB-1588]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of the Fenton process for the treatment of sawmill wastewater has been investigated. The sawmill wastewater was characterized by a moderate COD load (approximate to 3 g L-1), high ecotoxicity (approximate to 40 toxicity units) and almost negligible BOD/COD ratio (5 x 10(-3)) due to the presence of different fungicides such as propiconazole and 3-iodo-2-propynyl butyl carbamate, being the wastewater classified as non-biodegradable. The effect of the key Fenton variables (temperature (50-120 degrees C), catalyst concentration (25-100 mg L-1 Fe3+), H2O2 dose (1 and 2 times the stoichiometric dose) and the mode of H2O2 addition) on COD reduction and mineralization was investigated in order to fulfill the allowable local limits for industrial wastewater discharge and achieve an efficient consumption of H2O2 in short reaction times (1 h). Increasing the temperature clearly improved the oxidation rate and mineralization degree, achieving 60% COD reduction and 50% mineralization at 120 degrees C after 1 h with the stoichiometric H2O2 dose and 25 mg L-1 Fe3+. The distribution of H2O2 in multiple additions throughout the reaction time was clearly beneficial avoiding competitive scavenging reactions and thus, achieving higher efficiencies of H2O2 consumption (X-COD approximate to 80%). The main by-products were non-toxic short-chain organic acids (acetic, oxalic and formic). Thus, the application of the Fenton process allowed reaching the local limits for industrial wastewater discharge into local sewer system at a relatively low cost. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据