4.7 Article

Characterizing the release of different composition of dissolved organic matter in soil under acid rain leaching using three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 77, 期 1, 页码 15-21

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.06.026

关键词

Acid rain; Soil; Dissolved organic matter; Fluorescence; Aluminum

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20677055]
  2. China National Basic Research Program [2004CB418501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy (EEMS) has been widely used to characterize dissolved organic matter (DOM), there has no report that EEMS has been used to study the effects of acid rain on DOM and its composition in soil. In this work, we employed three-dimensional EEMS to characterize the compositions of DOM leached by simulated acid rain from red soil. The red soil was subjected to leaching of simulated acid rain of different acidity, and the leached DOM presented five main peaks in its EEMS: peak-A, related to humic acid-like (HA-like) material, at Ex/Em of 310-330/395-420 nm; peak-B, related to UV fulvic acid-like (FA-like) material, at Ex/Em of 230-280/400-435 nm: peak-C and peak-D, both related to microbial byproduct-like material, at Ex/Em of 250-280/335-355 nm and 260-280/290-320 nm, respectively; and peak-E, related to simple aromatic proteins, at Ex/Em of 210-240/290-340 nm. EEMS analysis results indicated that most DOM could be lost from red soil in the early phase of acid rain leaching. In addition to the effects of the pH of acid rain, the loss of DOM also depended on the properties of its compositions and the solubility of their complexes with aluminum. HA-like and microbial byproduct-like materials could be more easily released from red soil by acid rain at both higher pH (4.5 and 5.6) and lower pH (2.5 and 3) than that at middle pH (3.5). On the contrary, FA-like material lost in a similar manner under the action of different acid rains with pH ranging from 2.5 to 5.6. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据