4.5 Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Glycol Chitosan DNA Nanoparticles for Retinal Gene Delivery

期刊

CHEMMEDCHEM
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 189-196

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201300371

关键词

glycol chitosan; nanoparticles; nonviral gene delivery; polymers; retinal pigment epithelium

资金

  1. US National Eye Institute [EY018656, EY22778]
  2. Foundation Fighting Blindness
  3. Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science & Technology (USA)
  4. Fight for Sight grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the number of monogenic ocular diseases and the number of non-monogenic degenerative ocular diseases for which gene therapy is considered as a treatment, the development of effective therapeutic delivery strategies for DNA is a critical research goal. In this work, nonviral nanoparticles (NPs) composed of glycol chitosan (GCS) and plasmid DNA (pDNA) were generated, characterized, and evaluated. These particles are stable, do not aggregate in saline, are resistant to DNases, and have a hydrodynamic diameter of approximately 250nm. Furthermore, the plasmid in these NPs was shown to maintain its proper conformation and can be released and expressed inside the cell. To determine whether these NPs would be suitable for intraocular use, pDNA carrying the ubiquitously expressed CBA-eGFP expression cassette was compacted and subretinally injected into adult wild-type albino mice. At day14 post-injection (PI), substantial green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression was observed exclusively in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in eyes treated with GCS NPs but not in those treated with uncompacted pDNA or vehicle (saline). No signs of gross retinal toxicity were observed, and at 30days PI, there was no difference in electroretinogram function between GCS NP-, pDNA-, or vehicle-treated eyes. These results suggest that with further development, GCS NPs could be a useful addition to the available repertoire of genetic therapies for the treatment of RPE-associated diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据