4.6 Article

Multidentate Europium Chelates as Luminoionophores for Anion Recognition: Impact of Ligand Design on Sensitivity and Selectivity, and Applicability to Enzymatic Assays

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 20, 期 18, 页码 5298-5308

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201304942

关键词

anions; chelates; lanthanides; luminescence; sensors

资金

  1. TEKES (Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The design of photoluminescent molecular probes for the selective recognition of anions is a major challenge for the development of optical chemical sensors. The reversible binding of anions to lanthanide centers is one promising option for the realization of anion sensors, because it leads in some cases to a strong luminescence increase by the replacement of quenching water molecules. Yet, it is an open problem to gain control of the sensitivity and selectivity of the luminescence response. Primarily, the selective detection of (poly)phosphate species such as nucleotides has emerged as a demanding task, because they are involved in many biological processes and enzymatic reactions. We designed a series of pyridyl-based multidentate europium complexes (seven-, six-, and five-dentate) including sensitizing chromophores and studied their luminescence intensity and lifetime responses to different (poly)phosphates (adenosine triphosphate (ATP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), adenosine monophosphate (AMP), cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), pyrophosphate, and phosphate anions), and carboxyanions (citrate, malate, oxalacetate, succinate, -ketoglutarate, pyruvate, oxalate, carbonate). The results reveal that the number of free coordination sites has a significant impact on the sensitivity and selectivity of the response. Because of its reversibility, the lanthanide probes can be applied to monitor the activity of ATP-consuming enzymes such ATPases and apyrases, which is demonstrated by means of the five-dentate complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据