4.6 Article

High-Temperature Experimental and Theoretical Study of Magnetic Interactions in Diamond and Pseudo-Diamond Frameworks Built up from Hexanuclear Tantalum Clusters

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 22, 页码 6263-6271

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201002332

关键词

cluster compounds; density functional calculations; magnetic properties; tantalum; Xray diffraction

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of the Republic of Croatia [098-0982904-2946]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic interactions in solid-state tantalum cluster compounds have been evidenced by using magnetic susceptibility measurements and corroborated by broken-symmetry DFT calculations. The three selected compounds are based on [Ta6X12(H2O)(6)](3+) (X= Cl or/and Br) units with edge-bridged Ta-6 octahedral clusters. Although two of them crystallise in the tetragonal space group I4(1)/a, all compounds exhibit a similar arrangement of paramagnetic clusters related to the diamond structural framework (Fd (3) over barm space group). Magnetic parameters were fitted by using the [5,4] Pade approximant of high-temperature series expansion of susceptibility for the Heisenberg model (S= 1/2) in the diamond framework, assuming only nearest-neighbouring interactions. Such a model appropriately describes magnetic-susceptibility measurements at temperatures T > 0.7 |J|/ k. The magnetic interaction parameter J between two [Ta6Cl12(H2O)(6)](3+) clusters is estimated to be -64.28(7) cm(-1); it has been enhanced by replacing several chlorine inner ligands with bromine ones (J= -123(3) cm(-1) for two [Ta6Br7.7(1) Cl-4.3(1) (H2O)(6)](3+) clusters) and is strongest between two bromine [Ta6Br12(H2O)(6)](3+) clusters with a value of -155(1) cm(-1). Broken-symmetry DFT calculations within spin-dimer analysis confirmed this trend. Those interactions can be explained on the basis of the overlap between singly occupied a(2u) orbitals localised on neighbouring clusters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据