4.6 Article

Synthesis of Superacid-Functionalized Mesoporous Nanocages with Tunable Pore Diameters and Their Application in the Synthesis of Coumarins

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 16, 期 9, 页码 2843-2851

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200902531

关键词

heterogeneous catalysis; mesoporous materials; nanostructures; Pechmann reaction; resorcinol

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science. and Technology (MEXT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we demonstrate for the first time the preparation of a triflic acid (TFA)-functionalized mesoporous nanocage with tunable pore diameters by the wet impregnation method. The obtained materials have been unambiguously characterized by XRD, N-2 adsorption, FTIR spectroscopy, and NH3 temperature-programmed desorption (TPD). From the characterization results, it has been found that the TFA molecules are firmly anchored on the surface of the mesoporous supports without affecting their acidity. We also demonstrate the effect of the pore and cage diameter of the KIT-5 supports on the loading of TFA molecules inside the pore channels. It has been found that the total acidity of the materials increases with an increase in the TFA loading oil the support, whereas the acidity of the materials decreases with an increase in the pore diameter of the support. The acidity of the TFA-functionalized mesoporous nanocages is much higher than that of the zeolites and metal-substituted mesoporous acidic catalysts. The TFA-functionalized materials have also been employed as the catalysts for the synthesis of 7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin by means of the Pechmann reaction under solvent-free conditions. It has been found that the catalytic activity of the TFA-functionalized KIT-5 is much higher than that of zeolites and metal-substituted mesoporous catalytic materials in the synthesis of coumarin derivatives. The stability of the catalyst is extremely good and can be reused several times without much loss of activity in the above reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据