4.6 Article

Efficient Intramolecular Charge Transfer in Oligoyne-Linked Donor-pi-Acceptor Molecules

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 1470-1479

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200902099

关键词

charge transfer; fluorescence; oligoynes; oxadiazole; photodynamics; triarylamine

资金

  1. EPSRC
  2. CENAMPS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies are reported on a series of triphenylamine-(C C)(n)-2,5-diphenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazole dyad molecules (n = 1-4, 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively) and the related triphenylamine-C6H4-(C C)(3)-oxadiazole dyad 5. The oligoyne-linked D-pi-A (D=electron donor, A=electron acceptor) dyad systems have been synthesised by palladium-catalysed cross-coupling of terminal alkynyl and butadiynyl synthons with the corresponding bromoalkynyl moieties. Cyclic voltammetric studies reveal a reduction in the HOMO-LUMO gap in the series of compounds 1-4 as the oligoyne chain length increases, which is consistent with ex-tended conjugation through the elongated bridges. Photophysical studies provide new insights into conjugative effects in oligoyne molecular wires. In non-polar solvents the emission from these dyad systems has two different origins: a locally excited (LE) state, which is responsible for a pi-pi* fluorescence, and an intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) state, which produces charge-transfer emission. In polar solvents the LE state emission vanishes and only ICT emission is observed. This emission displays strong solvato-chromism and analysis according to the Lippert-Mataga-Oshika formalism shows significant ICT for all the luminescent compounds with high efficiency even for the longer more conjugated systems. The excited-state properties of the dyads in non-polar solvents vary with the extent of conjugation. For more conjugated systems a fast non-radiative route dominates the excited-state decay and follows the Engelman-Jortner energy gap law. The data suggest that the non-radiative decay is driven by the weak coupling limit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据