4.6 Article

Lewis Acid or Bronsted Acid Catalyzed Reactions of Vinylidene Cyclopropanes with Activated Carbon-Nitrogen, Nitrogen-Nitrogen, and Iodine-Nitrogen Double-Bond-Containing Compounds

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 963-971

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200801785

关键词

Bronsted acids; cyclo-additions; imines; indenes; Lewis acids; vinylidene cyclopropanes

资金

  1. Shanghai Municipal Committee of Science and Technology [06XD 14005, 08dj 1400100-2]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [(973)-2009CB825300]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20872162, 20672127, 20732008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lewis acid or Bronsted acid catalyzed reactions of vinylidene cyclopropanes (VDCPs). 1, with activated carbon-nitrogen. nitrogen-nitrogen, and iodine-nitrogen double-bond-containing compounds have been thoroughly investigated. We found that pyrrolidine and 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline derivatives can be formed in good yields in the reactions of VDCPs I with ethyl (arylimino)acetates 2 by a [3+2] cycloaddition or intramolecular Friedel-Crafts reaction pathway. Based on these results. we found that activated carbon-nitrogen and nitrogen-nitrogen double-bond-containing compounds, such as N-toluene-4-sulfonyl (N-Ts) imines 5 and diisopropylazodicarboxylate (7), can also react with VDCPs 1 to give [3+2] cycloaddition products in moderate to good yields in the presence of a Lewis acid. When N-tert-butoxycarbonyl aldimine 9 was used as the substrate. six-membered cycloaddition products 10 and 11 were formed in moderate yields in the presence of a Bronsted acid, trifluoremethanesulfonic acid (TfOH). The reactions of VDCPs 1 with N-Ts-iminophenyliodinane (12) were also carried Out in the presence of (CuOTf)2 center dot C6H6 and it was found that nitrogen-containing indene derivatives 13 were obtained, rather than the aziridination products. Plausible mechanisms for all of these transformations are discussed, based on the obtained results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据