4.6 Article

Diverse reactions of 1,4-dilithio-1,3-dienes with nitriles: Facile access to tricyclic Delta(1)-bipyrrolines, multiply substituted pyridines, siloles, and (Z,Z)-Dienylsilanes by tuning of substituents on the butadienyl skeleton

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 14, 期 18, 页码 5670-5679

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200701742

关键词

cyclization; nitrogen; heterocycles; polycycles; silanes; synthetic methods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Addition cyclization of 1,2,3,4-tetrasubstituted 1,4-dilithio-1,3-dienes (Type 1) with four equivalents of various aromatic nitriles in the presence of hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA) gives exclusively fully substituted pyridines in moderate to good yields. Similarly, trisubstituted pyridines can be prepared by the reaction of 2,3-dialkyl- or diaryl-substituted 1,4-dilithio-1,3-dienes (Type II) with nitriles. However, five- or six-membered ring fused 2,3-disubstituted 1,4-dilithio-1,3-dienes (Type III) reacted with various aromatic and aliphatic nitriles without a-hydrogen atoms to afford tricyclic Delta(1)-bipyrrolines in high yields. The reaction of six-membered-ring fused 2,3-disubstituted 1,4-dilithio-1,3-diene (Type III) with 2-cyanopyridine afforded the corresponding pyridine, and no tricyclic Delta(1)-bipyrroline was observed. Seven-membered-ring fused dilithio-dienes reacted with PhCN or trimethylacetonitrile to afford the corresponding pyridines in good yield. When 1,2,3,4-tetrasubstituted dilithio reagents (Type I) were treated with Me3SiCN, a tandem silylation/intramolecular substitution process readily occurred to yield siloles, whereas the reaction of 2,3-disubstituted dilithio reagents (Types II and III) with Me3SiCN gave rise to (Z,Z)-dienylsilanes with high stereoselectivity. These results revealed that the formation of tricyclic Delta(1)-bipyrrolines, pyridines, siloles, and (Z,Z)-dienylsilanes are strongly dependent on the substitution patterns of the dilithio butadienes and the nature of the nitriles employed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据