4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Acetylcholinesterase is involved in apoptosis in the precursors of human muscle regeneration

期刊

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
卷 187, 期 1-3, 页码 96-100

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2010.03.034

关键词

Acetylcholinesterase; Apoptosis; Human myoblasts; Muscle regeneration; Staurosporine; Desmin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The best established role of acetylcholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.7, AChE) is termination of neurotransmission at cholinergic synapses. However. AChE is also located at sites, where no other cholinergic components are present and there is accumulating evidence for non-cholinergic functions of this protein. In the process of skeletal muscle formation, AChE is expressed already at the stage of mononuclear myoblast, which is long before other cholinergic components can be demonstrated in this tissue. Myoblast proliferation is an essential step in muscle regeneration and is always accompanied by apoptosis. Since there are several reports demonstrating AChE participation in apoptosis one can hypothesize that early AChE expression in myoblasts reflects the development of the apoptotic apparatus in these cells. Here we tested this hypothesis by following the effect of siRNA AChE silencing on apoptotic markers and by determination of AChE level after staurosporine-induced apoptosis in cultured human myoblasts. Decreased apoptosis in siRNA AChE silenced myoblasts and increased AChE expression in staurosporine-treated myoblasts confirmed AChE involvement in apoptosis. The three AChE splice variants were differently affected by staurosporine-induced apoptosis. The hydrophobic (H) variant appeared unaffected, a tendency towards increase of tailed (T) variant was detected, however the highest, 8-fold increase was observed for readthrough (R) variant. In the light of these findings AChE appears to be a potential therapeutic target at muscle injuries including organophosphate myopathy. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据