4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Mechanism for potent reactivation ability of H oximes analyzed by reactivation kinetic studies with cholinesterases from different species

期刊

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
卷 187, 期 1-3, 页码 185-190

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2010.01.018

关键词

Human acetylcholinesterase; Rhesus monkey acetylcholinesterase; Guinea pig acetylcholinesterase; Nerve agent; H oxime; Reactivation mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxime-induced reactivation of organophosphorus (OP) nerve agent-inhibited acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is a very important step for the treatment of nerve agent toxicity. Therefore, extensive efforts are being made to develop more efficient and broad-spectrum oximes to replace the currently used oximes 2-PAM or obidoxime. In the 1970s and 1980s, several H oximes (such as HI-6 and HLo-7) were found to be very potent reactivators of non-aged soman-inhibited AChE. Later these oximes were shown to rapidly reactivate GF- and VR-inhibited AChE as well. However, the mechanism for the high potency of these H oximes is still unknown. In this study, the relationship between the reactivation rate constant of nerve agent-inhibited rhesus monkey AChE, human AChE and guinea pig AChE and the size of the alkoxyl (OR) group of nerve agents was analyzed. Results demonstrate that for nerve agent-inhibited rhesus monkey and human AChEs, reactivation by H oximes accelerated as the size of the OR group was increased. But with guinea pig AChE, reactivation by H oximes declined as the size of the OR group was increased. Reactivation kinetic study using GF- and VR-inhibited wild-type and mutant bovine AChEs has shown that mutations of Y124Q and W286A particularly reduced reactivation by these H oximes. Since these 2 amino acid residues are highly conserved in all AChEs sequenced to date, it is unlikely that the remarkable reduction observed in H oxime reactivation with guinea pig AChE is caused by a change in these two amino acid residues. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据