4.5 Review

Chemical toxicology of reactive intermediates formed by the glutathione-dependent bioactivation of halogen-containing compounds

期刊

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 145-159

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/tx700202w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concept that reactive intermediate formation during the biotransformation of drugs and chemicals is an important bioactivation mechanism was proposed in the 1970s and is now accepted as a major mechanism for xenobiotic-induced toxicity. The enzymology of reactive intermediate formation as well as the characterization of the formation and fate of reactive intermediates are now well-established. The mechanism by which reactive intermediates cause cell damage and death is, however, still poorly understood. Although most xenobiotic- metabolizing enzymes catalyze the bioactivation of chemicals, glutathione-dependent biotransformation has been largely associated with detoxication processes, particularly mercapturic acid formation. Abundant evidence now shows that glutathione-dependent biotransformation constitutes an important bioactivation mechanism for halogen-containing drugs and chemicals and has for many compounds been implicated in their organ-selective toxicity and in their mutagenic and carcinogenic potential. The glutathione-dependent biotransformation of haloalkenes is the first step in the cysteine S-conjugate beta-lyase pathway for the bioactivation of nephrotoxic haloalkenes. This pathway has been a rich source of reactive intermediates, including thioacyl halides, alpha-chloroalkenethiolates, 3-halo-alpha-thiolactones, 2,2,3-trihalothiiranes, halothioketenes, and vinylic sulfoxides. Glutathione-dependent bioactivation of gem-dihalomethanes and 1,2-, 1,3-, and 1,4-dihaloalkanes leads to the formation of alpha-chlorosulfides, thiiranium ions, sulfenate esters, and tetrahydrothiophenium ions, respectively, and these reactions lead to reactive intermediate formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据