4.6 Article

Cogeneration in integrated first and second generation ethanol from sugarcane

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
卷 91, 期 8, 页码 1411-1417

出版社

INST CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2013.05.009

关键词

Cogeneration; Ethanol; Simulation; Sugarcane; Biorefinery; Economic analysis; Life cycle analysis

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2011/19396-6, 08/57873-8]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [08/57873-8] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sugarcane bagasse and trash are used as fuels in cogeneration systems for bioethanol production, supplying steam and electricity, but may also be used as feedstock for second generation ethanol. The amount of surplus lignocellulosic material used as feedstock depends on the energy consumption of the production process; residues of the pretreatment and hydrolysis operations (residual cellulose, lignin and eventually biogas from pentoses biodigestion) may be used as fuels and increase the amount of lignocellulosic material available as feedstock in hydrolysis. The configuration of the cogeneration system (boiler pressure, lignocellulosic material consumption and steam production, turbines efficiencies, among others) has a significant impact on consumption of fuel and electricity output; in the integrated first and second generation, it also affects overall ethanol production. Simulations of the integrated first and second generation ethanol production processes were carried out using Aspen Plus, comparing different configurations of the cogeneration systems and pentoses use (biodigestion and fermentation). Economic analysis shows that electricity sale can benefit second generation ethanol, even in relatively small amounts. Environmental analysis shows that the integrated first and second generation process has higher environmental impacts in most of the categories evaluated than first generation. (C) 2013 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据