4.8 Article

A Functional Role for A in Metal Homeostasis? N-Truncation and High-Affinity Copper Binding

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 54, 期 36, 页码 10460-10464

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201502644

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid; bioinorganic chemistry; copper; peptides

资金

  1. Future Fellowship [FT110100199]
  2. ARC Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities grant [LE130100061]
  3. Senior Research Fellowship
  4. Foundation for Polish Science TEAM Program
  5. European Regional Development Fund [TEAM 2009-4/1]
  6. National Science Centre of Poland [2014/15/B/ST5/05229]
  7. Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology (CePT)
  8. European Regional Development Fund
  9. Innovative Economy, The National Cohesion Strategy of Poland
  10. National Science Center of Poland SONATA project [2012/07/D/ST4/02187]
  11. Australian Research Council [LE130100061] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accumulation of the -amyloid (A) peptide in extracellular senile plaques rich in copper and zinc is a defining pathological feature of Alzheimers disease (AD). The A1-x (x=16/28/40/42) peptides have been the primary focus of Cu-II binding studies for more than 15years; however, the N-truncated A4-42 peptide is a major A isoform detected in both healthy and diseased brains, and it contains a novel N-terminal FRH sequence. Proteins with His at the third position are known to bind Cu-II avidly, with conditional logK values at pH7.4 in the range of 11.0-14.6, which is much higher than that determined for A1-x peptides. By using A4-16 as a model, it was demonstrated that its FRH sequence stoichiometrically binds Cu-II with a conditional K-d value of 3x10(-14)M at pH7.4, and that both A4-16 and A4-42 possess negligible redox activity. Combined with the predominance of A4-42 in the brain, our results suggest a physiological role for this isoform in metal homeostasis within the central nervous system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据