4.7 Article

Kinetic analysis of a Cu-based oxygen carrier: Relevance of temperature and oxygen partial pressure on reduction and oxidation reactions rates in Chemical Looping with Oxygen Uncoupling (CLOU)

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 256, 期 -, 页码 69-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.102

关键词

CO2 capture; Chemical looping; CLOU; Copper; Kinetic

资金

  1. European Commission, under the RFCS program (ACCLAIM Project) [RFCP-CT-2012-00006]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN Project) [ENE2011-26354]
  3. European Union FEDER Funds
  4. European Social Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kinetic of reduction of CuO to Cu2O with N-2 + O-2 mixtures and the oxidation of Cu2O to CuO with O-2 of a Cu-based oxygen carrier for the CLOU process has been determined in a TGA. For kinetic determination, the O-2 concentrations were varied between 0 and 9 vol.% for reduction, and between 21 and 1.5 vol.% for oxidation reactions; temperature was varied between 1148 and 1273 K for the reduction and between 1123 and 1273 K for the oxidation. The oxygen carrier showed high reactivity both in oxidation and reduction reactions. The nucleation and nuclei growth model with chemical reaction control properly described the evolution of solids conversion with time. The Langmuir-Hinshelwood model was able to describe the effect of oxygen concentration on reduction and oxidation rates. The reaction order was 0.5 for reduction and 1.2 for the oxidation. The kinetic constant activation energies were 270 kJ mol(-1) for the reduction and 32 kJ moll for the oxidation. The kinetic model was used to calculate the solids inventory needed in the fuel reactor for complete combustion of three different rank coals. It was possible to use a low oxygen carrier inventory in the fuel reactor (160 kg/MWth) to supply the oxygen required to full lignite combustion. However, to reach high CO2 capture efficiencies (>= 95%), oxygen carrier inventories in fuel reactor higher than 600 kg/MWth were needed with the lignite. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据