4.7 Article

Facile template-free one-pot fabrication of ZnCo2O4 microspheres with enhanced photocatalytic activities under visible-light illumination

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 239, 期 -, 页码 192-199

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.021

关键词

Photocatalytic degradation; Visible light; ZnCo2O4 microspheres; Methylene blue; Mechanism

资金

  1. Science and Technology key project of Fujian [2013H0053]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhangzhou [ZZ2012J01]
  3. Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KLUEH201305]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of Fujian [2012J06005]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21076174, 21175115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A spinel photocatalyst, ZnCo2O4 hierarchical microspheres assembled by nanosheets, was fabricated by a facile template-free one-pot solvothermal reaction for the first time, and characterized by the methods of X-ray diffraction(XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy(DRS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area measurements, exhibited efficient photocatalytic activity in the degradation of organic pollutant under visible-light irradiation. The as-prepared microspheres with the diameter of about 5 mu m were assembled of nanosheets with the thickness of about 20 nm, and those nanosheets stack together tightly to form 3-D hierarchical framework among them. The photocatalytic degradation rate of methylene blue onto the ZnCo2O4 from solvothermal reaction at 180 degrees C was higher than that of N-TiO2. The adsorptive isotherm indicated that monolayer adsorption was existed between photocatalyst surface and organic pollutants. The main oxidative species in the photocatalytic process could be attributed to be center dot O-2(-) and photogenerated holes, and partly involved by (OH)-O-center dot. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据