4.7 Article

Studying competitive sorption behavior of methylene blue and malachite green using multivariate calibration

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 554-564

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.084

关键词

Cationic dyes; Spectral overlap; Multivariate calibration; Competitive sorption

资金

  1. Hashemite University (Zarqa, Jordan)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sorption of methylene blue MB and malachite green MG (with 96.4% spectral overlap) from bi-solute solution by natural kaolinitic-clay and philipsite-rich-zeolite tuff was addressed where solutes simply quantified using multivariate calibration MVC. For simultaneous quantification of dyes in solution, partial least squares PLS1 (a powerful MVC tool) was found satisfactory with high recovery (98.7-103.2%) and precision (RSD 9.2-11.7%). In MVC, the spectral range 409-700 nm is used and 43 spectral points where taken for each sample. Natural clay (80% kaolinite) and zeolite tuff (95% philipsite) showed a high uptake for dyes with maximum capacities of 0.77 mmol MB/g(clay) and 0.64 mmol MG/g(clay), 0.66 mmol MB/g(zeolite) and 1.22 mmol MG/g(zeolite) reported at 1.0 g/L, particle diameter <45 mu m, 20.0 degrees C and pH 7.0. Due to competition between dyes for active sites, the sorption capacities were reduced and the highest reduction was 30% which observed for MG sorption by clay. The competition between dyes was higher in clay as indicated from competition factors CFs. Sorption isotherms of bi-solute systems have irregular L2 isotherm shape and the data were fairly correlated to Langmuir and competitive Langmuir models. The contribution of ion-exchange mechanism in dyes removal was found significant, 61% and 79% of MB were removed via ion-exchange by clay and zeolite, respectively. Using MVC, studying competitive sorption of MB and MG without the need for chromatographic separation is accomplished. Studying competitive sorption of more than two solutes using PLS1 is also possible indicating the high resolution power of this technique. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据