4.7 Article

Poly(ethylene glycol methacrylate phosphate-co-2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propane sulfonate) pore-filled substrates for heavy metal ions sorption

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 9-16

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.064

关键词

In situ polymerization; Membranes; Bi-functional groups; Uranium; Selectivity; Sorption kinetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bi-functional membranes/sorbents have been prepared by anchoring cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol methacrylate phosphate-co-2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propane sulfonate) (poly(EGMP-co-AMPS)) in pores of the microporous substrates by in situ photo-polymerization. Thus prepared materials are found to sorb U(VI) from seawater (98%) as well as from 4 mol L-1 HNO3 (80%). The poly(EGMP-co-AMPS) (1:1) could be anchored 170 wt.% in grafted fibrous poly(propylene) membrane. This membrane is found to take up 200 wt.% water, and has U(VI) loading capacity 2.9 x 10(-3) mol g(-1). The metal ions sorption kinetics has been found to be dependent not only on physical structure of host substrate but also on proportion of EGMP and AMPS in the guest component poly(EGMP-co-AMPS). The competitive sorption of U(VI) and Fe(III) has suggested that the selectivity of poly(EGMP-co-AMPS) towards U(VI) decreases with increase of AMPS proportion in the polymer, and selectivity is completely lost when AMPS units are more than 4 times with respect to EGMP (phosphate bearing units). However, the kinetics of U(VI) sorption increases with increase of AMPS units in poly(EGMP-co-AMPS). U(VI) sorption efficiency is not affected by the presence of 10,000 times excess of moles of representative ions like Ca, Cu and V in solution. However, Fe(III) compete with U(VI) for sorption in poly(EGMP-co-AMPS) anchored membrane. Desorptions of U(VI), Fe(III) and other ions from the membrane samples are found to be quantitative in equilibration with 0.5 mol L-1 Na2CO3, 0.2 mol L-1 EDTA, and 1 mol L-1 HCl, respectively. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据