4.7 Article

Effect of salting out on the desorption-resistance of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in coastal sediment

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 84-92

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.069

关键词

Coastal sediment; Desorption; Desorption-resistance; PAHs; Salting out; Sorption

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2009-0075952]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of ''salting out'' on the sorption and desorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in coastal sediment were investigated. The sorption and desorption isotherms of three PAHs (naphthalene, phenanthrene and pyrene) in coastal sediment were linear. The distribution coefficients of sorption (K-d,K-s) and desorption (K-d,K-d) increased with salinity and hydrophobicity (log K-ow). A three-dimensional model was proposed to explain the combined effects of solubility (S), log Kow and the organic-carbon normalized partition coefficient (log K-oc). The sequential desorption of phenanthrene at different salinities of 0-30 ppt from sediment was conducted after sequential sorption at 0 and 30 ppt, respectively. The desorption data was fitted to a biphasic desorption model including linear labile fraction and non-linear desorption-resistant fraction. The linear distribution coefficient (Kd(a)(lab)) for the labile desorption fraction was affected by the salinity in the previous sequential sorption stage, whereas the desorption-resistance parameters such as the maximum capacity of the desorption-resistant fraction (q(max)(res), mg/kg) and the organic carbon-normalized distribution coefficient in the desorption-resistant fraction (K-oc(res), L/kg-OC), were affected by the salinity in the current desorption stage. In conclusion, the salinity increased the sorbed capacity of PAH as well as the desorption-resistance (as indicated by both q(max)(res) and K-oc(res)) due to the salting out effect. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据