4.7 Article

Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite from fish scale waste: Preparation, characterization and application for selenium adsorption in aqueous solution

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 522-532

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.054

关键词

Nanocrystalline; Hydroxyapatite; Selenium; Adsorption isotherm; Kinetic study

资金

  1. Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission, through the Food and Functional Food Research Cluster of Khon Kaen University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite prepared from fish scale waste (FHAp) using the alkaline heat treatment method was used as an adsorbent for the removal of selenite. The FHAp was characterized by BET surface analysis, TG/DTG/DTA, FTIR, XRD and TEM-EDX. Batch adsorption experiments were performed to investigate the effects of various parameters including pH of solution, contact time and initial selenium concentration on adsorption efficiency. The results revealed that FHAp nanocrystals (15-20 nm) possessed a good ability to adsorb selenite. First order kinetic, pseudo-second order and intraparticle diffusion model were used to evaluate the kinetic models and the mechanism of adsorption. A comparison of FHAp with other adsorbents was illustrated. Both kinetics and adsorption behavior using Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms were tested. It was found that the kinetics data were fitted well by a pseudo-second order model and the Freundlich isotherm suitably ascribed the adsorption. The adsorption capacities of the FHAp, CHAp (commercial hydroxyapatite), CS (chitosan) and FS (fish scale) itself towards Se (IV) ion were found to be 5.51, 1.42, 1.35 and 2.12 (mg g(-1)) (L mg(-1))(1/n), respectively. Therefore, it is evident that the FHAp nanopowders from the fish scale waste can be used as a natural adsorbent with high adsorption efficiency. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据