4.7 Article

Alumina coatings on silica powders by Fluidized Bed Chemical Vapor Deposition from aluminium acetylacetonate

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 211, 期 -, 页码 68-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.048

关键词

CVD; Fluidization; Particle processing; Materials; Alumina; Morphology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A SiO2 powder has been coated by alumina using the Fluidized Bed Chemical Vapor Deposition process and a metal organic precursor, aluminium acetylacetonate (Al(acac)(3) or C15H21AlO6) as single source. A range of low temperatures, i.e. 400-620 degrees C has been explored at atmospheric pressure. Systematic characterizations were performed by Field Emission Gun Scanning Electron Microscopy (FEG-SEM) coupled with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FT-IR) spectroscopy and Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-AES). The process involves a first step of gas phase reactions producing reactive intermediates, themselves leading to Al2O3 and carbon containing deposits. Between 400 and 500 degrees C, the deposits are lamellar and constituted of mixtures of Al2O3, non-decomposed Al(acac)(3) and impurities, leading to a C/Al molar ratio close to 2. For this range of temperature, the precursor is not totally decomposed and the limiting parameter of the process is the deposition temperature. For 600 and 620 degrees C, the deposits are nodular and mainly formed of Al2O3 and acetylacetone C5H8O2, one of the main intermediate species formed in the gas phase. The Al(acac)(3) decomposition seems to be complete, but a deposition temperature of 620 degrees C is not high enough to allow a complete decomposition of carbon ligands of the chemisorbing intermediate species. For these conditions, the C/Al molar ratio increases with the deposition temperature, to reach values between 4 and 6, in agreement with the observed darker colors of the deposits. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据