4.7 Article

The combined use of magnetic field and iron-based complex in advanced treatment of pulp and paper wastewater

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 232-238

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.058

关键词

Magnetization; Complex; Flocs; Wastewater; Pilot scale test

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50878121, 51178252]
  2. Shandong Outstanding Young and Middle-aged Scientists Research Award Fund [BS2011HZ007]
  3. Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program in the Eleventh Five-year Plan Period [2006BAJ08B05-2]
  4. National Major Special Technological Programmes Concerning Water Pollution Control and Management in the Eleventh Five-year Plan Period [2008ZX07010-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method for the advanced treatment of pulp and paper wastewater was presented by combining the magnetization with iron-based complex. The iron-based complex was prepared by ferric sulfate and polycarboxylic acid (PA), forming the Fe-PA complex. Effect of magnetization conditions (magnetic intensity and water velocity) on the physical and chemical properties of wastewater were measured. Results indicated that the conductivity and surface tension of wastewater have been greatly changed after the magnetization process, and the optimal magnetizing conditions were determined as magnetic intensity of 750 mT and water velocity of 4.4 m/s. Parameters of the flocs indicated that the properties of flocs formed by Fe-PA complex were enhanced by magnetization. What's more, the pretreatment of wastewater by magnetization accelerated the removal of CODCr and cut down about 7.7% of the Fe-PA complex dosage. In addition, the pilot scale test (1000 m(3)/d) was designed and the combined use of magnetization and Fe-PA complex demonstrated the excellent performance for the advanced treatment of pulp and paper wastewater, with the cost only 0.84 RMB/m(3) (0.13 US$/m(3)) for the whole pilot scale system. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据