4.7 Article

The effect of surface acidic and basic properties on the hydrogenation of aromatic rings over the supported nickel catalysts

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 162, 期 1, 页码 371-379

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.019

关键词

Supported nickel catalysts; Active metal surface area; Microcalorimetric adsorption; Surface acidity and basicity; Toluene hydrogenation; Phenol hydrogenation

资金

  1. NSFC [20673055]
  2. MSTC [2005CB221400]
  3. Jiangsu Province, China [BE2009145]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ni/Al2O3, Ni/MgAlO and Ni/MgO catalysts containing about 60 wt% of nickel were prepared by the coprecipitation method. The textural and structural properties were characterized and it was found that the dispersion of nickel was high in these catalysts. The active nickel surface area was found to be high (78 m(2)/g(cat).) in Ni/MgAlO, corresponding to the average nickel particle size of 3.5 nm. Microcalorimetric adsorption of NH3 and CO2 showed that the Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/MgO exhibited strong surface acidity and basicity, respectively, while the Ni/MgAlO possessed both surface acidity and basicity. In addition, both the initial heat and coverage were higher on Ni/Al2O3 than on Ni/MgO for the adsorption of toluene, indicating the strong interaction between the aromatic rings in toluene (that may act as a Lewis base due to the enriched electron densities) and the surface acidic sites on the support. The adsorption of toluene on the metallic nickel surface produced higher heat, indicating the strong interaction of the pi electrons in aromatic rings of toluene with the d orbitals of surface nickel atoms. Although the adsorption of H-2 showed the higher active surface nickel area in Ni/MgAlO than in Ni/Al2O3, the activities of hydrogenation of toluene and phenol were significantly higher on Ni/Al2O3 than on Ni/MgAlO, indicating the important effect of surface acidity on the hydrogenation of aromatic rings. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据