4.5 Article

Heuristics for exact nonnegative matrix factorization

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION
卷 65, 期 2, 页码 369-400

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-015-0350-z

关键词

Nonnegative matrix factorization; Exact nonnegative matrix factorization; Heuristics; Simulated annealing; GRASP; Hybridization; Nonnegative rank; Linear Euclidean distance matrices; Slack matrices; Extension complexity

资金

  1. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme
  2. Belgian Science Policy Office
  3. Concerted Research Action (ARC) programme by Federation Wallonia-Brussels [ARC 14/19-060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The exact nonnegative matrix factorization (exact NMF) problem is the following: given an m-by-n nonnegative matrix X and a factorization rank r, find, if possible, an mby- r nonnegative matrix W and an r-by-n nonnegative matrix H such that X = WH. In this paper, we propose two heuristics for exact NMF, one inspired from simulated annealing and the other from the greedy randomized adaptive search procedure. We show empirically that these two heuristics are able to compute exact nonnegative factorizations for several classes of nonnegative matrices (namely, linear Euclidean distance matrices, slack matrices, unique-disjointness matrices, and randomly generated matrices) and as such demonstrate their superiority over standard multi-start strategies. We also consider a hybridization between these two heuristics that allows us to combine the advantages of both methods. Finally, we discuss the use of these heuristics to gain insight on the behavior of the nonnegative rank, i.e., the minimum factorization rank such that an exact NMF exists. In particular, we disprove a conjecture on the nonnegative rank of a Kronecker product, propose a new upper bound on the extension complexity of generic n-gons and conjecture the exact value of (i) the extension complexity of regular n-gons and (ii) the nonnegative rank of a submatrix of the slack matrix of the correlation polytope.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据