4.7 Article

Intensifying esterification reaction between lactic acid and ethanol by pervaporation dehydration using chitosan-TEOS hybrid membranes

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 155, 期 3, 页码 800-809

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.07.044

关键词

Pervaporation; Hybrid membrane; Intensification; Ethyl lactate; Esterification

资金

  1. National basic research program of China [2009CB623404]
  2. Tianjin Science & Technology Research Program [06YFGPSH03400]
  3. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B06006]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Esterification assisted by pervaporation separation can enhance the yield of ester for thermodynamically or kinetically limited reaction via selective removal of water from the reaction mixture. In the present study, organic-inorganic hybrid membranes were prepared by in situ hydrolysis and condensation of tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) within chitosan (CS) aqueous solution for pervaporation-assisted esterification of lactic acid with ethanol, catalyzed by Amberlyst 15 ion-exchange resin. The composition and structural properties of CS-TEOS hybrid membranes were investigated by FT-IR, XRD, TGA and contact angle. The dehydration performances of hybrid membranes were evaluated by pervaporation of aqueous ethanol solution. Comparing with CS pristine membrane, CS-TEOS hybrid membranes exhibited remarkably enhancing pervaporation property. Pervaporation-assisted esterification results suggested that the incorporation of pervaporation process to preferentially remove water from the reaction mixture substantially enhanced the yield of ethyl lactate from 66 wt.% to 80 wt.%. The effects of membrane casting solution recipe, reaction temperature, initial molar ratio of ethanol to lactic acid and catalyst loading amount on the process performance have been examined in detail. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据