4.4 Article

Prediction of Organ Toxicity Endpoints by QSAR Modeling Based on Precise Chemical-Histopathology Annotations

期刊

CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN
卷 80, 期 3, 页码 406-416

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2012.01411.x

关键词

database of chemical toxicity; histopathology; kidney toxicity; liver toxicity; ontology of toxic pathology; organ toxicity; quantitative structure-activity relationship; recursive partitioning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to accurately predict the toxicity of drug candidates from their chemical structure is critical for guiding experimental drug discovery toward safer medicines. Under the guidance of the MetaTox consortium (Thomson Reuters, CA, USA), which comprised toxicologists from the pharmaceutical industry and government agencies, we created a comprehensive ontology of toxic pathologies for 19 organs, classifying pathology terms by pathology type and functional organ substructure. By manual annotation of full-text research articles, the ontology was populated with chemical compounds causing specific histopathologies. Annotated compound-toxicity associations defined histologically from rat and mouse experiments were used to build quantitative structureactivity relationship models predicting subcategories of liver and kidney toxicity: liver necrosis, liver relative weight gain, liver lipid accumulation, nephron injury, kidney relative weight gain, and kidney necrosis. All models were validated using two independent test sets and demonstrated overall good performance: initial validation showed 0.800.96 sensitivity (correctly predicted toxic compounds) and 0.851.00 specificity (correctly predicted non-toxic compounds). Later validation against a test set of compounds newly added to the database in the 2 years following initial model generation showed 7587% sensitivity and 6078% specificity. General hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity models were less accurate, as expected for more complex endpoints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据