4.6 Article

Controlled Synthesis and Characterization of Highly Dispersed Molybdenum Oxide Supported on Silica SBA-15

期刊

CHEMCATCHEM
卷 3, 期 11, 页码 1814-1821

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201100154

关键词

molybdenum; Raman spectroscopy; silicates; structure-activity relationships; synthesis design

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 546]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silica-supported molybdenum oxide catalysts with high densities of disperse molybdenum oxide species of up to 3.5 atoms?nm-2 were prepared by using a novel synthesis approach on the basis of functionalized mesoporous SBA-15. As revealed by using Raman spectroscopy and thermal analysis, the synthesis mechanism consists of an ion exchange of heptamolybdate ions (Mo7O246-) into the porous functionalized framework and decomposition of the intact precursor into smaller fragments during final calcination. The amount of dispersed molybdenum oxide as well as the ratio of dispersed to crystalline molybdenum oxide was determined in detail for Mo densities of 013.0 atoms?nm-2 by using a combination of X-ray fluorescence (XRF), energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), and Raman spectroscopy. Up to 3.5 atoms?nm-2 dehydrated molybdenum oxide is present exclusively as dispersed species. At higher densities, additional Mo is introduced as crystalline MoO3, and the amount of dispersed species remains unchanged. The structure of the supported molybdenum oxide under ambient conditions largely resembles that of heptamolybdate ions. Dehydration leads to the formation of grafted monomeric and connected molybdenum oxide surface species. Detailed X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis revealed an increase in the Mo/Si ratio as well as a positive binding energy shift upon dehydration, indicative of an increase in the dispersion of the supported molybdenum oxide. The combination of Raman and XPS analyses establishes a correlation of the changes in structure and dispersion of the supported molybdenum oxide species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据