4.6 Article

Disrupted Effective Connectivity Between the Amygdala and Orbitofrontal Cortex in Social Anxiety Disorder During Emotion Discrimination Revealed by Dynamic Causal Modeling for fMRI

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 895-903

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht279

关键词

amygdala; DLPFC; fMRI; orbitofrontal cortex; social anxiety disorder

资金

  1. OeNB grant (Austrian National Bank) [P12982]
  2. FWF grant (Austrian Science Fund) [P23021]
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Lundbeck A/S
  5. FWF, Austrian Science Fund [P23021]
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P23021] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is characterized by over-reactivity of fear-related circuits in social or performance situations and associated with marked social impairment. We used dynamic causal modeling (DCM), a method to evaluate effective connectivity, to test our hypothesis that SAD patients would exhibit dysfunctions in the amygdala-prefrontal emotion regulation network. Thirteen unmedicated SAD patients and 13 matched healthy controls performed a series of facial emotion and object discrimination tasks while undergoing fMRI. The emotion-processing network was identified by a task-related contrast and motivated the selection of the right amygdala, OFC, and DLPFC for DCM analysis. Bayesian model averaging for DCM revealed abnormal connectivity between the OFC and the amygdala in SAD patients. In healthy controls, this network represents a negative feedback loop. In patients, however, positive connectivity from OFC to amygdala was observed, indicating an excitatory connection. As we did not observe a group difference of the modulatory influence of the FACE condition on the OFC to amygdala connection, we assume a context-independent reduction of prefrontal control over amygdalar activation in SAD patients. Using DCM, it was possible to highlight not only the neuronal dysfunction of isolated brain regions, but also the dysbalance of a distributed functional network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据