4.6 Article

Coevolution of Gyral Folding and Structural Connection Patterns in Primate Brains

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 1208-1217

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs113

关键词

axonal pushing; brain evolution; cortical folding; diffusion tensor imaging

资金

  1. NIH [EB 006878, R01 HL087923-03S2, PO1 AG026423]
  2. University of Georgia
  3. NWPU Foundation for Fundamental Research
  4. China Government Scholarship
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  6. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1149260] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both cortical folding and structural connection patterns are more elaborated during the evolution of primate neocortex. For instance, cortical gyral shapes and structural connection patterns in humans are more complex and variable than those in chimpanzees and macaques. However, the intrinsic relationship between gyral folding and structural connection and their coevolution patterns across primates remain unclear. Here, our qualitative and quantitative analyses of in vivo diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data consistently demonstrate that structural fiber connection patterns closely follow gyral folding patterns in the direction tangent to the cortical sphere, and this close relationship is well preserved in the neocortices of macaque, chimpanzee, and human brains, despite the progressively increasing complexity and variability of cortical folding and structural connection patterns. The findings suggest a hypothesis that a common axonal fiber pushing mechanism sculpts the curved patterns of gyri in the tangent direction during primate brain evolution. Our DTI/MRI data analysis provides novel insights into the structural architecture of primate brains, a new viewpoint of the relationship between cortical morphology and connection, and a basis for future elucidation of the functional implication of coevolution of cortical folding and structural connection patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据