4.6 Article

Focal Damage to the Adult Rat Neocortex Induces Wound Healing Accompanied by Axonal Sprouting and Dendritic Structural Plasticity

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 281-291

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhq091

关键词

cortical injury; interneuron; neurogenesis; plasticity; regeneration

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. JO and JR Wicking Trust (ANZ Trustees)
  3. Tasmanian Masonic Centenary Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accumulating evidence indicates that damage to the adult mammalian brain evokes an array of adaptive cellular responses and may retain a capacity for structural plasticity. We have investigated the cellular and architectural alterations following focal experimental brain injury, as well as the specific capacity for structural remodeling of neuronal processes in a subset of cortical interneurons. Focal acute injury was induced by transient insertion of a needle into the neocortex of anesthetized adult male Hooded-Wistar rats and thy1 green fluorescent protein (GFP) mice. Immunohistochemical, electron microscopy, and bromodeoxyuridine cell proliferation studies demonstrated an active and evolving response of the brain to injury, indicating astrocytic but not neuronal proliferation. Immunolabeling for the neuron-specific markers phosphorylated neurofilaments, alpha-internexin and calretinin at 7 days post injury (DPI) indicated phosphorylated neurofilaments and alpha-internexin but not calretinin immunopositive axonal sprouts within the injury site. However, quantitative studies indicated a significant realignment of horizontally projecting dendrites of calretinin-labeled interneurons at 14 DPI. This remodeling was specific to calretinin immunopositive interneurons and did not occur in a subpopulation of pyramidal neurons expressing GFP in the injured mouse cortex. These data show that subclasses of cortical interneurons are capable of adaptive structural remodeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据