4.6 Article

Human Auditory Cortex Activity Shows Additive Effects of Spectral and Spatial Cues during Speech Segregation

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 698-707

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhq136

关键词

attention; MEG; scene analysis; streaming; speech

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Chinese State Scholarship Fund
  4. 973 National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB320901]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30670704, 30711120563]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In noisy social gatherings, listeners perceptually integrate sounds originating from one person's voice (e.g., fundamental frequency (f(0)) and harmonics) at a particular location and segregate these from concurrent sounds of other talkers. Though increasing the spectral or the spatial distance between talkers promotes speech segregation, synergetic effects of spatial and spectral distances are less well understood. We studied how spectral and/or spatial distances between 2 simultaneously presented steady-state vowels contribute to perception and activation in auditory cortex using magnetoencephalography. Participants were more accurate in identifying both vowels when they differed in f(0) and location than when they differed in a single cue only or when they shared the same f(0) and location. The combined effect of f(0) and location differences closely matched the sum of single effects. The improvement in concurrent vowel identification coincided with an object-related negativity that peaked at about 140 ms after vowel onset. The combined effect of f(0) and location closely matched the sum of the single effects even though vowels with different f(0), location, or both generated different time courses of neuromagnetic activity. We propose that during auditory scene analysis, acoustic differences among the various sources are combined linearly to increase the perceptual distance between the co-occurring sound objects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据