4.7 Article

The effect of Co dopant on TiO2 structure of sol-gel nanopowders used as photocatalysts

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 12273-12284

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.072

关键词

Sol-gel processes; X-ray methods; TiO2; Photocatalysts

资金

  1. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNDI-UEFISCDI [PN-II-PT-PCCA-2011-3.1-0031]
  2. Romanian Academy Program: Oxide systems obtained by the sol gel method [4.12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Un-doped and Co-doped sol-gel TiO2 nanopowders have been prepared and structurally characterized. Three Co mass concentrations related to TiO2 content have been used: 0.5, 1 and 2 wt%. The morpho-structural changes due to the thermal treatment and dopant presence were followed by: thermal analysis methods, X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and magnetic measurements. A detailed XRD analysis, based on an own calculus program, has established the lattice constants, the average size of the crystallites, < D >, and the average lattice strains, < S >, which can give some information about the structural disorder. The values of the lattice constants lead to the conclusion that a solid solution of the CoxTi1-xO2 form was obtained. The Co concentration imprints the paramagnetic behavior to the solid solutions. It influences the evolution of the < D > and < S > factors by the competition between: the deficit of oxygen acquired by un-doped TiO2 in the sol gel process (influenced by temperature), the dopant diffusion in the host lattice (influenced by ionic radius and valence) and the super-exchange interactions between the magnetic moments of the molecules of the solid solution (influenced by the concentration of Co). The sample with 1 wt% Co thermally treated at 400 degrees C ensures the best photocatalytic activity in the advanced degradation of nitrobenzene from water. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据