4.6 Article

Mammalian target of rapamycin-independent S6K1 and 4E-BP1 phosphorylation during contraction in rat skeletal muscle

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 1877-1886

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.05.005

关键词

Contraction; S6K1; 4E-BP1; eIF4B; Protein synthesis; AMPK

资金

  1. Interuniversity Poles of Attraction Belgian Science Policy [P6/28, P7/13]
  2. Patrimoine of the Universite catholique de Louvain
  3. Directorate General Higher Education and Scientific Research, French Community of Belgium
  4. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS, Belgium) [3.4518.11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Muscle protein synthesis rates decrease during contraction/exercise, but rapidly increase post-exercise. Previous studies mainly focused on signaling pathways that control protein synthesis during post-exercise recovery, such as mTOR and its downstream targets S6K1 and 4E-BP1. In this study, we investigated the effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation on the phosphorylation state of signaling components controlling protein synthesis in rat skeletal muscle. Electrical stimulation increased S6K1 Thr389 phosphorylation, which was unaffected by Torin1, a selective mTOR inhibitor, suggesting that S6K1 phosphorylation by contraction was mTOR-independent Phosphorylation of eIF4B Ser422 was also increased during electrical stimulation, which was abrogated by inhibition of MEK/ERK/RSK1 activation. Moreover, although phosphorylation of conventional mTOR sites in 4E-BP1 decreased during contraction, mTOR-independent phosphorylation was also apparent, which was associated with the release of 4E-BP1 from eIF4E. The results indicate mTOR-independent phosphorylation of S6K1 and 4E-BP1 and suggest MEK/ERK/RSK1-dependent phosphorylation of eIF4B during skeletal muscle contraction. These phosphorylation events would keep the translation initiation machinery primed in an active state so that protein synthesis could quickly resume post-exercise. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据