4.2 Article

Activation of Microglia by Histamine and Substance P

期刊

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 768-780

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000363041

关键词

Microglial activation; Histamine; Substance P; CNS immune inflammation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81102422, 81373398]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2010020]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Activated microglia perform many of the immune effector functions typically associated with macrophages. However, the regulators involved in microglial activation are not well defined. Because microglia play a pivotal role in immune surveillance of the CNS, we studied the effect of the neuromediators histamine and substance P on microglia. Methods: The induction of microglial activation by histamine and substance P was examined using primary cultured microglia. Fluorescent images were acquired with a confocal microscope. The levels of TNF-alpha and IL-6 were measured with a commercial ELISA kit. Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels were determined by dichlorodihydrofluorescein oxidation. The mitochondrial membrane potential was assessed with the MitoProbe (TM) JC-1 assay kit. Results: We found that the neuromediators histamine and substance P were able to stimulate microglial activation and the subsequent production of ROS and proinflammatory factors TNF-alpha and IL-6, These effects were partially abolished by antagonists of the histamine receptors H1 and H4 and of the substance P receptors NK-1, NK-2 and NK-3. Histamine induced mitochondrial membrane depolarization in microglia. Conclusions: These results indicate that the neuromediators histamine and SP can trigger microglial activation and release of pro inflammatory factors from microglia, thus contributing to the development of microglia-mediated inflammation in the brain. Copyright (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据