4.5 Review

Of men in mice: the success and promise of humanized mouse models for human malaria parasite infections

期刊

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 602-611

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cmi.12277

关键词

-

资金

  1. NRSA Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award [F32 AI091129]
  2. Foundation for the National Institutes of Health through the Grand Challenges in Global Health Initiative [ID 1481]
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grant [OPP1021571]
  4. Department of Defense [W81XWH-11-2-0184]
  5. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1021571] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forty percent of people worldwide are at risk of malaria infection, and despite control efforts it remains the most deadly parasitic disease. Unfortunately, rapid discovery and development of new interventions for malaria are hindered by the lack of small animal models that support the complex life cycles of the main parasite species infecting humans. Such tools must accommodate human parasite tropism for human tissue. Mouse models with human tissue developed to date have already enhanced our knowledge of human parasites, and are useful tools for assessing anti-parasitic interventions. Although these systems are imperfect, their continued refinement will likely broaden their utility. Some of the malaria parasite's interactions with human hepatocytes and human erythrocytes can already be modelled with available humanized mouse systems. However, interactions with other relevant human tissues such as the skin and immune system, as well as most transitions between life cycle stages in vivo will require refinement of existing humanized mouse models. Here, we review the recent successes achieved in modelling human malaria parasite biology in humanized mice, and discuss how these models have potential to become a valuable part of the toolbox used for understanding the biology of, and development of interventions to, malaria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据