4.5 Article

EspFU, a type III-translocated effector of actin assembly, fosters epithelial association and late-stage intestinal colonization by E-coli O157:H7

期刊

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 836-847

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01087.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI046454-08, R21 AI067827, R21-AI67827, R01 AI049470, R01-AI49470, R01 AI046454, R01 AI049740-04] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30DK-34928, P30 DK034928] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [R01-A146454] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli ( EHEC) O157: H7 induces filamentous actin-rich ` pedestals' on intestinal epithelial cells. Pedestal formation in vitro requires translocation of bacterial effectors into the host cell, including Tir, an EHEC receptor, and EspF(U), which increases the efficiency of actin assembly initiated by Tir. While inactivation of espF(U) does not alter colonization in two reservoir hosts, we utilized two disease models to explore the significance of EspF(U)-promoted actin pedestal formation. EHEC Delta espF(U) efficiently colonized the rabbit intestine during co-infection with wild-type EHEC, but co-infection studies on cultured cells suggested that EspFU produced by wild-type bacteria might have rescued the mutant. Significantly, EHEC Delta espF(U) by itself was fully capable of establishing colonization at 2 days post inoculation but unlike wild type, failed to expand in numbers in the caecum and colon by 7 days. In the gnotobiotic piglet model, an espF(U) deletion mutant appeared to generate actin pedestals with lower efficiency than wild type. Furthermore, aggregates of the mutant occupied a significantly smaller area of the intestinal epithelial surface than those of the wild type. Together, these findings suggest that, after initial EHEC colonization of the intestinal surface, EspF(U) may stabilize bacterial association with the epithelial cytoskeleton and promote expansion beyond initial sites of infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据