4.7 Article

Lysozyme activates Enterococcus faecium to induce necrotic cell death in macrophages

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
卷 67, 期 19, 页码 3331-3344

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-010-0384-9

关键词

Enterococcus faecium; Enterococci; Lysozyme; Necrosis; Mouse macrophage; Toll-like receptors; Peritonitis model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enterococci are commensal organisms in the alimentary tract. However, they can cause a variety of life-threatening infections, especially in nosocomial settings. We hypothesized that induction of cell death might enable these facultative pathogenic bacteria to evade the innate immune response and to cause infections of their host. We demonstrate that E. faecium when exposed to lysozyme induces cell death in macrophages in vitro and in vivo. Flow cytometric analyses of J774A.1 macrophages infected with E. faecium revealed loss of cell membrane integrity indicated by uptake of propidium iodide and decrease of the inner mitochondrial transmembrane potential Delta I-m. Inhibition of caspases, treatment of macrophages with cytochalasin D, or rifampicin did not prevent cells from dying, suggesting cell death mechanisms that are independent of caspase activation, bacterial uptake, and intracellular bacterial replication. Characteristics of necrotic cell death were demonstrated by both lack of procaspase 3 activation and cell shrinkage, electron microscopy, and release of lactate dehydrogenase. Pretreatment of E. faecium with lysozyme and subsequently with broad spectrum protease considerably reduced cell death, suggesting that a bacterial surface protein is causative for cell death induction. Moreover, in a mouse peritonitis model we demonstrated that E. faecium induces cell death of peritoneal macrophages in vivo. Altogether, our results show that enterococci, under specific conditions such as exposure to lysozyme, induce necrotic cell death in macrophages, which might contribute to disseminated infections by these facultative pathogenic bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据