4.4 Article

The Cooperation of Enamelin and Amelogenin in Controlling Octacalcium Phosphate Crystal Morphology

期刊

CELLS TISSUES ORGANS
卷 194, 期 2-4, 页码 194-198

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000324208

关键词

Enamel; 32-kDa enamelin; Amelogenin self-assembly; Circular dichroism; Dynamic light scattering; Fluorescence spectroscopy; Octacalcium phosphate

资金

  1. NIH-NIDCR [DE-13414, DE-02009, DE-15644]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE013414] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL &CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE015644] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enamel matrix proteins, including the most abundant amelogenin and lesser amounts of enamelin, ameloblastin, and proteinases, play vital roles in controlling crystal nucleation and growth during enamel formation. The cooperative action between amelogenin and the 32-kDa enamelin is critical to regulating the growth morphology of octacalcium phosphate crystals. Using biophysical methods, we investigated the interaction between the 32-kDa enamelin and recombinant pig amelogenin 148 (rP148) at pH 6.5 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Dynamic light scattering results showed a trend of increasing particle size in the mixture with the addition of enamelin to amelogenin. Upon addition of the 32-kDa enamelin, the shift and intensity decrease in the ellipticity minima of rP148 in the circular dichroism spectra of rP148 illustrated a direct interaction between the 2 proteins. In the fluorescence spectra, the maximum emission of rP148 was blue shifted from 335 to 333 nm in the presence of enamelin as a result of complexation of the 2 proteins. Our results demonstrate that the 32-kDa enamelin has a close association with amelogenin at pH 6.5 in PBS buffer. Our present study provides novel insights into the possible cooperation between enamelin and amelogenin in macromolecular coassembly and in controlling enamel mineral formation Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据