4.7 Article

Epidermal Snail expression drives skin cancer initiation and progression through enhanced cytoprotection, epidermal stem/progenitor cell expansion and enhanced metastatic potential

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 310-320

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2013.148

关键词

skin cancer; EMT; Snail; stem cells

资金

  1. FWO
  2. Geconcerteerde Onderzoeksacties of Ghent University
  3. Stichting tegen Kanker
  4. Association for International Cancer Research (Scotland)
  5. EU-FP6 framework program BRECOSM [LSHC-CT-2004-503224, 2008-201662]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 829, Z2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Expression of the EMT-inducing transcription factor Snail is enhanced in different human cancers. To investigate the in vivo role of Snail during progression of epithelial cancer, we used a mouse model with skin-specific overexpression of Snail. Snail transgenic mice spontaneously developed distinct histological subtypes of skin cancer, such as basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and sebaceous gland carcinoma. Development of sebaceous gland carcinomas strongly correlated with the direct and complete repression of Blimp-1, a central regulator of sebocyte homeostasis. Snail expression in keratinocyte stem cells significantly promotes their proliferation associated with an activated FoxM1 gene expression signature, resulting in a larger pool of Mts24-marked progenitor cells. Furthermore, primary keratinocytes expressing Snail showed increased survival and strong resistance to genotoxic stress. Snail expression in a skin-specific p53-null background resulted in accelerated formation of spontaneous tumours and enhanced metastasis. Our data demonstrate that in vivo expression of Snail results in de novo epithelial carcinogenesis by allowing enhanced survival, expansion of the cancer stem cell pool with accumulated DNA damage, a block in terminal differentiation and increased proliferation rates of tumour-initiating cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据