4.7 Article

HDAC5 is required for maintenance of pericentric heterochromatin, and controls cell-cycle progression and survival of human cancer cells

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 1239-1252

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2012.3

关键词

histone deacetylases; cancer cells; siRNA; autophagy; cell proliferation; chemotherapy

资金

  1. National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS) (Belgium)
  2. Centre Anti-Cancereux pres de l'Universite de Liege
  3. Fonds Leon Fredericq
  4. TELEVIE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) form a family of enzymes, which have fundamental roles in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression and contribute to the growth, differentiation, and apoptosis of cancer cells. In this study, we further investigated the biological function of HDAC5 in cancer cells. We found HDAC5 is associated with actively replicating pericentric heterochromatin during late S phase. We demonstrated that specific depletion of HDAC5 by RNA interference resulted in profound changes in the heterochromatin structure and slowed down ongoing replication forks. This defect in heterochromatin maintenance and assembly are sensed by DNA damage checkpoint pathways, which triggered cancer cells to autophagy and apoptosis, and arrested their growth both in vitro and in vivo. Finally, we also demonstrated that HDAC5 depletion led to enhanced sensitivity of DNA to DNA-damaging agents, suggesting that heterochromatin de-condensation induced by histone HDAC5 silencing may enhance the efficacy of cytotoxic agents that act by targeting DNA in vitro. Together, these results highlighted for the first time an unrecognized link between HDAC5 and the maintenance/assembly of heterochromatin structure, and demonstrated that its specific inhibition might contribute to increase the efficacy of DNA alteration-based cancer therapies in clinic. Cell Death and Differentiation (2012) 19, 1239-1252; doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.3; published online 3 February 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据