4.7 Article

Doxorubicin bypasses the cytoprotective effects of eIF2 alpha phosphorylation and promotes PKR-mediated cell death

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 145-154

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2010.76

关键词

PKR; doxorubicin; eIF2 alpha; JNK; protein phosphorylation; apoptosis

资金

  1. Montreal Centre for Experimental Therapeutics in Cancer (MCETC)
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. Fonds de la Reserche en Sante Quebec (FRSQ)
  4. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (CCSRI) [017285]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The eukaryotic cell responds to various forms of environmental stress by adjusting the rates of mRNA translation thus facilitating adaptation to the assaulting stress. One of the major pathways that control protein synthesis involves the phosphorylation of the alpha-subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor eIF2 at serine 51. Different forms of DNA damage were shown to induce eIF2 alpha phosphorylation by using PERK, GCN2 or PKR. However, the specificity of the eIF2 alpha kinases and the biological role of eIF2 alpha phosphorylation pathway in the DNA damage response (DDR) induced by chemotherapeutics are not known. Herein, we show that PKR is the eIF2 alpha kinase that responds to DDR induced by doxorubicin. We show that activation of PKR integrates two signaling pathways with opposing biological outcomes. More specifically, induction of eIF2 alpha phosphorylation has a cytoprotective role, whereas activation of c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) by PKR promotes cell death in response to doxorubicin. We further show that the proapoptotic effects of JNK activation prevail over the cytoprotection mediated by eIF2 alpha phosphorylation. These findings reveal that PKR can be an important inducer of cell death in response to chemotherapies through its ability to act independently of eIF2 alpha phosphorylation. Cell Death and Differentiation (2011) 18, 145-154; doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.76; published online 18 June 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据