4.3 Article

Inhibitory interaction of the 14-3-3 proteins with ubiquitous (PMCA1) and tissue-specific (PMCA3) isoforms of the plasma membrane Ca2+ pump

期刊

CELL CALCIUM
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 550-561

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.09.003

关键词

plasma membrane calcium pump; isoforms; 14-3-3 proteins; inhibitory interaction; calcium homeostasis

资金

  1. Telethon [GGP04169] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A previous study has demonstrated that the ubiquitous plasma membrane Ca2+ pump PMCA4 interacted with isoform epsilon of the 14-3-3 protein, whereas the nervous tissue-specific PMCA2 did not. The 14-3-3 proteins are widely expressed small acidic proteins, which modulate cell signaling, intracellular trafficking, transcription and apoptosis. The investigation has been extended to the other tissue-restricted pump (PMCA3) and to the other ubiquitous pump (PMCA1). At variance with PMCA2, PMCA3 interacted with the 14-3-3 epsilon protein in a two-hybrid system assay, which could not be used for PMCA1. The 14-3-3 epsilon protein immunoprecipitated with both PMCA3 and PMCA1 when expressed in HeLa cells. Pull-down experiments using GST-PMCA1 and GST-PMCA3 fusion products confirmed the interaction of both pumps with the 14-3-3 epsilon protein. The binding was phosphorylation-independent with both PMCA3 and PMCA1. The 14-3-3 isoform also interacted with PMCA3; however, it did not interact with PMCA1. The effect of the interaction on the activity of the two pumps, and thus on the homeostasis of Ca2+, was investigated by co-expressing the 14-3-3 epsilon protein and PMCA3 or PMCA1 in CHO cells together with the recombinant Ca2+ indicator acquorin: the ability of cells to re-establish the basal Ca2+ concentration following a Ca2+ transient induced by an InSP3-producing agonist was substantially decreased with both pumps, indicating that the interaction with the 14-3-3 protein inhibited the activity of both PMCA3 and PMCA1. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据