4.4 Article

Mesenchymal stem cells protect islets from hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced injury

期刊

CELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND FUNCTION
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 637-643

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cbf.1701

关键词

mesenchymal stem cells; islets; hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced injury; apoptotic; glucose-stimulated insulin secretion

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB522401]
  2. Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [30872382, 30872528]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R)-induced injury is the key factor associated with islet graft dysfunction. This study aims to examine the effect of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on islet survival and insulin secretion under H/R conditions. Islets from rats were isolated, purified, cultured with or without MSCs, and exposed to hypoxia (O-2 <= 1%) for 8 h and reoxygenation for 24 and 48 h, respectively. Islet function was evaluated by measuring basal and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). Apoptotic islet cells were quantified using Annexin V-FITC. Antiapoptotic effects were confirmed by mRNA expression analysis of hypoxia-resistant molecules, HIF-1 alpha, HO-1, and COX-2, using semi-quantitative retrieval polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Insulin expression in the implanted islets was detected by immunohistological analysis. The main results show that the stimulation index (SI) of GSIS was maintained at higher levels in islets co-cultured with MSCs. The MSCs protected the islets from H/R-induced injury by decreasing the apoptotic cell ratio and increasing HIF-1 alpha, HO-1, and COX-2 mRNA expression. Seven days after islet transplantation, insulin expression in the MSC-islets group significantly differed from that of the islets-alone group. We proposed that MSCs could promote anti-apoptotic gene expression by enhancing their resistance to H/R-induced apoptosis and dysfunction. This study provides an experimental basis for therapeutic strategies based on enhancing islet function. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据