4.4 Article

Analysis of paraoxonase 1 (PON1) genetic polymorphisms and activities as risk factors for ischemic stroke in Turkish population

期刊

CELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND FUNCTION
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 558-567

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cbf.1607

关键词

genotype; paraoxonase; PON1; polymorphism; stroke

资金

  1. Middle East Technical University Research Project [BAP-2005-07-02-00-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) is protective against the development of atherosclerosis. a risk factor for ischemic stroke. PON1 gene has one promoter region (-107T/C) and two coding region (192Q/R and 55L/M) polymorphisms that affect the levels and catalytic efficiency of the enzyme. respectively. In this study. we aimed to determine the importance of -107T/C. 192Q/R and 55L/M polymorphisms of PON1 gene and three PON1 activity (diazoxonase, paraoxonase, arylesterase) as risk factors for ischemic stroke Methods Stud population was comprised of 172 unrelated adult Caucasian patients with acute hemispheric ischemic stroke and 105 symptom-free controls. Genotypes were attained by PCR followed by restriction enzyme digestion and phenotypes were determined by spectrophotometric assays. Results This is the first study analyzing diazoxonase activity as a risk factor for ischemic stroke Nevertheless, diazoxonase, paraoxonase and arylesterase activities were almost the manic in stroke patients and controls The 107TT genotype was associated with a 1 97 times increased risk for stroke in elderly (age > 59). Individuals with this genotype were found to have the lowest PON1 enzyme activities among the -107T/C genotypes Triple combined haplotype QRLMTC was found to be 6.94- and 10.4-times protective against ischemic stroke in the overall and the elderly Population. respectively. 55LL genotype was associated with 1 78-fold increase in the risk of ischemic stroke Conclusion PON1 genotypes, but not activities, are related with the risk of stroke. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据