4.4 Review

Mechanisms of action of mesenchymal stem cells in cutaneous wound repair and regeneration

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 348, 期 3, 页码 371-377

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-012-1393-9

关键词

Mesenchymal stem cells(MSCs); Skin; Repair; Regeneration; Mechanism

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81071551, 30500194, 30730090, 81121004]
  2. Advanced Talent Item of Colleges and Universities of Guangdong Province
  3. National Basic Science and Development Program (973 Program) [2005CB522603, 2012CB518105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells with the capacity for self-renewal and differentiation and have a broad tissue distribution. These characteristics make them candidate cells for wound healing and regeneration in a variety of disorders. Endogenous MSCs or exogenously delivered MSCs can traffic and migrate to injured tissue and participate in the healing of this tissue. The concentrated conditioned medium from MSCs can modulate wound repair without MSCs being present in the wound. The therapeutic effects of MSCs might be attributable to their ability to differentiate and transdifferentiate into tissue-specific cells, to fuse with the resident cells, to secrete a wide array of paracrine factors in order to stimulate the survival and functional recovery of the resident cells, or to regulate the local microenviroment or niche and immune response. These mechanisms are probably independent but not mutually exclusive. In many circumstances, a combination of these protective mechanisms might work together to affect cutaneous wound healing. This review gives a brief overview and discusses the mechanisms by which MSCs promote skin repair and regeneration, although the specific mechanisms in each type of cutaneous wound are still unclear and controversial. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms should allow us to find advanced and better treatment strategies for various skin diseases, even those that are currently incurable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据