4.4 Article

Discrete localization of various fatty-acid-binding proteins in various cell populations of mouse retina

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 338, 期 2, 页码 191-201

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-009-0862-2

关键词

Retina; Fatty-acid-binding proteins; Photic injury; Retinal microglia; Macrophage; Mouse

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan [20590180, 18390056]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20590180, 18390056] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various fatty acids (FAs) are involved as an energy source in many different functions in the organism. They are also essential ingredients of membranous lipids and act as intracellular signaling molecules. Intracellular fatty-acid-binding proteins (FABPs) comprise a family of soluble lipid-binding proteins with low molecular masses and solubilize long-chain FAs to allow intracellular translocation in the aqueous cytosol. To clarify the functions of FABPs in the retina, which is remarkably rich in polyunsaturated FAs, we have investigated the localization of B (brain type)-, H (heart type)-, E (epidermal type)-, and A (adipocyte type)-FABPs in adult mouse retinae by immunohistochemistry. In order to determine the possible involvement of FABPs in retinal degenerative diseases, we have also examined changes in FABP expression in light-induced photoreceptor cell degeneration (photic injury). The discrete localization of B-, H-, E-, and A-FABP species in various cell populations of the retina has been clarified: B-FABP is mainly localized in the cone photoreceptor cells, H-FABP in some populations of amacrine/bipolar/horizontal interneurons, and E-FABP in ganglion cells, with A-FABP-like immunoreactivity being located in resident microglia of normal retinae. E-FABP has further been localized in invasive macrophages in damaged retinae following photic injury, allowing discrete identification of the resident microglia and invasive macrophages by A- and E-FABP immunoreactivity, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据